Handicap Discrimination Often leads to Worker's Compensation Benefits

Massachusetts General Laws c. 151 B and 152, speakrequirements.
directly to handicap disability under the worker'sEmployers aren't required to provide a particular
compensation act. Pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 152, anaccommodation proposed by a handicapped person if
employee who sustains a work related injury and isthere is an alternative accommodation that is available
capable of performing the essential functions of aand that would enable the person to perform the
job, with or without reasonable accommodation is ajobs essential functions or if the employer can
"qualified handicapped person" under thedemonstrate an undue burden on the company. An
Massachusetts discrimination statute. Pursuant toemployer may require proof of the existence of an
Massachusetts General Laws c. 151 B § 1, aimpairment if a handicapped person requests
"qualified handicapped person is defined as; areasonable accommodation. An employer is only
handicapped person who is capable of performingrequired to accommodate an employee's condition
essential functions of a particular job, or who wouldand isn't required to accommodate the employee's
be capable of performing the essential functions of amisconduct. An example of this is in the case of
particular job with reasonable accommodation to hismental illness an employer doesn't need to
handicap.accommodate anti-social behavior.
Massachusetts General Laws c. 151 B § 4(16),An accommodation doesn't have to be independently
makes it unlawful for an employer to dismiss fromrequired by other safety or health regulations in order
employment or otherwise discriminate any personfor said accomadation to be considered reasonable.
alleging to be a qualified handicapped person becauseExamples of reasonable accommodations include;
of that handicap, as long as the person is capable ofchanges in work schedules and assigned tasks,
performing the essential functions of the positionmodification of job requirements, and provisions of
involved with the reasonable accommodation, unlessadaptive equipment, a part-time or flexible schedule,
the employer can demonstrate that theand lastly light duty work.
accommodation required to be made to the physicalLastly an employer doesn't have to undertake an
or mental limitations of the person would impose andaccommodation if doing so conflicts with the
undue hardship to the employer's business. It is thefollowing; contractual rights of other employees, if it
employer's burden to demonstrate that thecauses other employees to work harder or longer
accommodation sought is unreasonable because ithours, or requires the employer to hire new
would impose an undue hardship on the employersemployees. The United States Supreme Court has
business. Yates v. Mass- C.E.O.P.S., 17 MDLR 1503,held that an accommodation is not required under the
1514 (1995).American with Disabilities Act (ADA) if it conflicts with
A reasonable accommodation under Massachusettsa company's seniority rules, unless the employee
law is amodification made in the way a job isshows "special circumstances."
conducted to enable handicapped workers toAn example of handicap discrimination that could lead
perform specific job functions. The issue ofto worker's compensation benefits is; if an employee
reasonable accommodation is only considered when awho suffered a work-related shoulder injury while
handicapped person is not able to perform theoperating a truck without power steering, was
essential functions of the job. In areas employeesdischarged after being refused future assignments to
need assistance, employed are obligated to maketrucks with power steering, and his injury prevented
reasonable accommodation unless thehim from operating such trucks, the employee could
accommodation would impose an undue hardship orstate a claim under both the Worker's Compensation
require waiving or excusing an inability to perform anAct and Massachusetts General Laws c. 151 B.
essential job function including, productivity